Racism Saves Lives#RacismIsLove #4Racism Racism is Love #RacismIsLove #4Racism
 • Anti-Racism is Anti-Science

#TheTruthIsRacist • #BlackLivesMatter2RacistsSite MapDisclaimer 

Unequal rights, Minority Privilege

Black caucus, La Raza, Black Lives Matter, "no beer for racists", affirmative action, cultural appropriation, antifa violence, and dozens of more examples of unequal rights.

  &&link inside article&&

We list dozens of examples how "racist" Whites do not have the same rights as Blacks, immigrants, or Muslims.

See also Unequal treatment, unequal rights #1

Unequal Rights #2

Unequal Rights #3, Black and Leftist Privilege

Violence by Anti-Racists is justified


Note: we will omit the feminist Pussy Pass here
("violence against women act")Science Fraud (DV) by PC

Left-Racists have introduced clearly discriminatory laws and regulations to treat people different by color of skin, religion, and gender.

See also Anti-Racists are Racists: Left-Racists

 Left Privilege

Anti-racists are Bigots. Bigoted Anti-Bigots.

Black Privilege

Freudian projection: Anti-Racists guilty of Racism, all racist sins

See also Violence by Anti-Racists is justified



Everyone can see the inequality by using the technique of Flipping Race.

See Flipping Race to show inequality
Flipping race #2 to notice left-racist unequal treatment

Continues at Unequal Rights #2




With German Precision, the German PresseKodex 12.1 explicitly demands different treatment for underprivileged minorities ONLY.

See Press code & AP style books

Minority means non-White

MLK Racist? Color Blindness, the new Racism.

Occasionally, Swedes and even Americans tell the truth, too, about mandatory discrimination against Whites, Christians, males

See also Victim classes rank ordered


In a letter dated April 19, prosecutor Göran Lambertz explained why:
"The purpose behind the law against incitement of ethnic hatred was to ensure legal protection for minority groups of different compositions and followers of different religions. Cases where people express themselves in a critical or derogatory way about men of ethnic Swedish background were not intended to be included in this law. Because of that, the content in this article cannot be considered incitement of ethnic hatred." [VDARE.COM NOTE: Compare U.S. Civil Rights Commissioner Mary Frances Berry`s statement that "Civil rights laws were not passed to protect the rights of white men and do not apply to them."]
So now it`s official: Swedes can go to jail if they say rude things about the foreigners whom they have generously allowed into their country. But foreigners and anyone else may say whatever they like about Swedes. [VDARE ]


Erbsünde: original sin

German Nazi Guilt Complex: Cruel and Unusual Punishment

need to pay to Blacks

Indigenous Rights for Whites: Genocide #3: Whites are indigenous peoples of Europe. But the UN's rights of indigenous people apply only to indigenous Australian aborigines and the likes?




Unequal Rights, unequal treatment based on the color of a person's skin are the hallmark of Anti-Racists. 

We call this "racist" behavior of anti-racists LeftRacism, to differentiate it from "racism" as defined by the Anti-Racist Left.

More at Anti-Racists are Racists: Left-Racists


Negative Generalizations about non-whites: hate crimes.
Negative Generalization about whites: ok

Clearly, it’s perfectly acceptable to make generalizations about a people when being positive and pandering. Only generalizations that are negative—about anyone other than Americans—constitute hate crimes.
  • “Muslims are peaceful.”—ACCEPTABLE.
  • “Muslims are violent.”—HATE CRIME.
  • “Americans are violent.”—ACCEPTABLE.
  • “Americans are peaceful.”—NATIVIST.
Stripped of the argument that generalizations are out of bounds, we can get on with evaluating whether it’s a good idea or a bad idea to jettison our own culture for another one. 
[Source: "In Trump We Trust": E Pluribus Awesome!" by Ann Coulter]

See also Generalization, discrimination


Minority Privilege

Anti-Racists talk about equality but promote unequal rights. Anti-Racists are biased in favor of minorities, of "historically underprivileged" classes and clearly discriminate against Whites.


Black Privilege

Black Privilege: Blacks can use the N-word, riot without consequences, also the C word (cracker) and other pejoratives for Whites. Whites must never ever use the N word. In many country there are fines and prison terms as punishments. At least job loss!



All Lives Matter

  • "Black Lives Matter" is not only ok, it is great.
  • "All lives matter" is racist.
  • "Blue (police) lives matter" is racist.
  • "White lives matter" would be unimaginable!

See also Flipping Race to show inequality

 As noted in this article, Hillary Clinton’s campaign was one of blatant pandering. All the potential Democratic nominees found themselves forced to condemn the slogan “all lives matter.” Such spectacles made them seem sensitive to non-whites in a way that disgusted many whites.  [Source: BLM]

Non-violent Christians worse than Jihadists

UK bans three bishops from Iraq and Syria from entering the country but violent Jihadist preachers and ISIS fighters returning from middle East wars are welcome.

See "Bacon thrower" murdered


BANNED #Ferguson Video Media is Covering Up

How media and anti-racists fan hate and how they treat races differently




Unequal Rights in Work and College Admission

Affirmative Action kills: Blacks are not held to the same standards as Whites. Blacks get admitted in colleges with SAT results that disqualify Whites. Black police with criminal records, Underqualified Black firemen fire officers who don't pass normal entrance requirements are a danger to their colleagues and the public..





No Beer for Racists

No beer for racists (i.e. members of a democratic anti-immigration party): good

Asylum seekers must not enter store: extremely racist [source]



Diversity Is Strength! It’s Also…Increasingly Unequal Justice For Whites


Michelle Malkin: “Cultural Appropriation” v. Blasphemy—Sombreros, Qipaos and Catholic Cosplay, Oh My!

According to the white people who run the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center, eating tacos, drinking tequila and wearing sombreros on Cinco de Mayo "are textbook examples of cultural appropriation." Euro-privileged people at Gonzaga University similarly warned "non-Mexican individuals" on campus not to wear costumes insensitive to the "Latinx culture." No-nos included "serapes" and "fake mustaches." [...]
An African-American writer at The Root, a website for "Black news, opinions, politics, and culture," counseled non-Mexican people on behalf of Mexican people to "cut it out with being a culturally appropriating jackass and leave the sombreros home."
According to the a white girl cannot wear a Chinese qipao dress to prom because Asian-Americans might be offended—even though actual Chinese people are not. The cultural contretemps was set off by a Chinese-American man, Jeremy Lam, who fumed, "My culture is NOT your goddamned prom dress"—while littering his own social media feed with ghetto slang ("N---- dayuum!") appropriated from rappers. [...]
To review the misappropriation mandates so far: teenage white girls in Utah can't wear Chinese dresses to prom. Non-Mexicans can't wear sombreros on Cinco de Mayo. Wearing other groups' attire as costumes is insensitive. Re-appropriating phrases deemed inappropriate is inappropriate, even if done by a member of the aggrieved minority victimized by inappropriate appropriation. History shall not be trivialized. Identity must be respected.
So it is with extreme befuddlement and bewilderment that I sifted through pages and pages of photos from this week's Met Gala, whose theme was "Heavenly Bodies: Fashion and the Catholic Imagination."
Pop diva Rihanna came dressed as a stiletto-heeled pope in pearls, crystals and sky-high medieval headgear. (Will The Root writer scold her to cut it out with being a Catholic appropriating jackass and leave the bedazzled mitre at home?)
Nickelodeon alum Ariana Grande, draped in Vera Wang's cherub-adorned silk organza, chirped that she represented "the back wall of the Sistine Chapel" and felt "fairly important in this outfit, I have to say."
Entertainer Katy Perry, donning massive white feathered wings on her back that seem to have been borrowed from last year's Victoria's Secret runway, pronounced herself "angelic, celestial, ethereal." [...]
Rosy-cheeked, mantilla-clad Kate Bosworth mimicked the Virgin Mary. Former Disney star Zendaya strutted the red carpet in Versace chain mail and Joan of Arc bangs. Nicki Minaj, last seen appropriating the Chinese martial arts video game cartoon character Chun Li (because that's OK), channeled the devil. And assorted supermodels and their arm candy escorts sported rosaries, halos and veils like haute couture cosplay.
Now, this is the point at which I might cry out indignantly: My religion is not your costume! But the Vatican actually collaborated with the Met Gala on the event, donating prized vestments, cassocks and other relics. No, I'm not offended. I'm just queasy and exhausted from trying to keep track of what we're supposed to wear and not wear, say and not say, eat or drink and not eat or drink, and who all is allowed to dictate what to whom and when.
"Piss Christ" is art. Muhammad cartoons are fatal blasphemy. Suburban girls in qipaos are human rights violators, but black female rappers and their fans in Chinese ox horn buns are cutting-edge. College kids in sombreros must be re-programmed, but Kim Kardashian parading like an oversized, gold-sequined chalice with crucifix stick-ons is high style. [Source: Michelle Malkin: “Cultural Appropriation” v. Blasphemy—Sombreros, Qipaos and Catholic Cosplay, Oh My! ]




Guardian: The Beckhams have too many children

Restrict children for rich whites

A fourth child for the filthy rich, highly successful, intelligent white Beckham couple is reason for complaints about irresponsible population growth.


Unlimited population growth for starving Africans

Out of fear of racism, we don't hear much about the problem of the population explosion of Haiti, Nigeria, Africa, or of immigrants in Europe.

Rarely do we hear concern about large numbers of children in dirt poor, low IQ, high crime populations, that often are unable to feed their children without the aid of white nations.  







The Guardian takes time out from whooping the anti-Murdoch brouhaha to address today's most pressing issue: Beckhams a 'bad example' for families 

 With a fourth child, the couple have joined the ranks of the irresponsible, population experts say  David and Victoria Beckham may have been overjoyed to welcome their new daughter, Harper Seven, last week but, according to a growing group of campaigners, the birth of their fourth child make the couple bad role models and environmentally irresponsible. 
 Background for non-Brits: David Beckham was the most famous soccer player of a decade ago. Victoria Beckham was Posh Spice in the Spice Girls. In celebrity wattage, they are roughly the British equivalent of Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie (although, in contrast, they are married).
I don't think the taboo in recent years on discussing population growth has much of anything to do with China and has everything to do with whose populations are growing: i.e., people who don't look like the Beckhams. Recall, for example, in all the write-ups about Haiti after the 2010 earthquake how almost everybody, except Jared Diamond and myself, danced around the Haitian population growth problem. Similarly, the U.N. recently issue population projections saying that the population of Nigeria would be over 700 million by the end of the century. You'll notice the deafening silence over that. [Source: Guardian: The Beckhams have too many children, 2]




I like being Black vs. White



blocks refugee pay stub,
allows praise of Jihad

See also Facebook blockage




All races are equal. If white Europeans are better off, they must be exploiting Africans. Blacks are poo 

Anti-Racists favor very unequal rights and unequal treatment for the races.  In spite of officially espousing the anti-racist equality dogma, whites can be openly despised and aggressed against.  The protected races can never be offended the slightest.

see also Freudian projection:
Anti-Racists guilty of Racism, of all racist sins

Unequal Rights for minorities, for "historically underprivileged" classes is the hallmark of Anti-Racism.

The Christian baker was fined hugely for refusing to bake a wedding cake for a gay wedding. It is totally unthinkable to force a Muslim baker to bake a gay wedding cake.

See also Flipping Race or religion to show inequality

Opfer zweiter Klasse

Und es gibt Opfer, die wenn sie es überhaupt in die Medien schaffen, dann meist nur als Randnotiz, möglichst schnell verschwinden. Die Terroropfer von Paris, Brüssel, Nizza, Berlin, London, St. Petersburg und Stockholm – wer kennt sie? Aber wir erinnern uns noch gut an den dreijährigen Syrer Aylan Kurdi, dessen Vater als Schlepper und Asylbetrüger seinen Tod in Kauf nahm und dessen toter Körper am Strand Bodrum für die Lügenpresse so drapiert wurde, dass man ihn auf ewig in Szene setzen kann, dessen Bild wochenlang durch die Presse ging. Er war ein VIP-Opfer. Das Mädchen oben heißt Ebba Åkerlund, sie ist ein Opfer zweiter Klasse.

WashingtonPost: “‘How Dare You Work on Whites’: Professors Under Fire for Research on White Mortality”

‘How dare you work on whites’: Professors under fire for research on white mortality
By Jeff Guo April 6 at 6:00 AM
Wonkblog Analysis
Academic research rarely goes viral, but this past year, the work of Princeton professors Anne Case and Nobel laureate Angus Deaton became the center of a national fascination over the woes of white America. It’s also landed the two in the crossfire of a debate about race and the lack of attention given to problems faced by African Americans.


The refugees no one wants - White GeNOcide Project

South African white victims of discrimination


In South Africa, White Boers are forced to live in shanty towns because the post-Nelson Mandela era isn’t as “rainbow” as was promised. For over a decade, laws have been in place which deliberately put Whites at a severe disadvantage…Read more →


Sweden allows ISIS flag

&&Germany Merkel dislikes German flag


Mit Segen der Staatsanwaltschaft: Deutsche dürfen ab sofort als „Köterrasse“ bezeichnet werden

Bestie Islam: So grausam folterten die islamischen Terroristen ihre Geiseln in Nairobi



#KillAllWhiteMen? What about #KillAllMuslims? (see below)

Institutionalized Black Privilege runs rampant, under the guise of righting past racist wrongs by Whites,


Only White People can be Racist

Black Privilege


No presumption of Innocence for white males

The presumption of innocence is an idea that leftists only believe in when they aren’t in power.
When the left isn’t in power, then it may protect civil liberties to protect itself. When one of its own radicals is sitting in the White House, then it leads lynch mobs through the streets. The protests aren’t acts of weakness by victims, but signs of strength by oppressors. [...]
 Never have lynch mobs received such universal acclaim from all the powers of the United States of America.
The progressive lynch mobs in Ferguson and at the University of Virginia contend that some crimes are too hurtful to a particular population to be protected by the presumption of innocence. Some suspects should be presumed guilty because of the combination of their race and gender with a national crisis.
After fighting for Al Qaeda terrorists at Gitmo, the left hypocritically decided that the presumption of innocence should apply to Muslim terrorists but not to police officers. The civil libertarians of the left went from championing the rights of criminals over those of victims to embracing the conservative position of victim rights… as long these rights are reserved for only the right sorts of victims.
The activists of the left must be forced to admit whether they are for or against the presumption of innocence. If they want to dispense with the presumption of innocence when it comes to enemies of the people like police officers and fraternity members, it will also go away for Islamic terrorists and violent thugs. Not to mention Weather Underground terrorists teaching at prestigious progressive colleges.
We cannot have a presumption of innocence for some people and not others. The left is not entitled to create two justice systems for two types of people. One group will be lynched with a formality of a trial manipulated to produce a verdict that not only damns one defendant, but also his entire race or gender. The other will receive every possible defense no matter how obvious his guilt may be.
America is a nation of laws, not of racist lynch mobs. Its trials are based on facts, not on narratives. The presumption of innocence matters more than the narrative and the social justice hashtag. Without it all we have left are racist lynch mobs with smartphones marching through Manhattan. 
Source: [Leftist Lynch Mobs from Ferguson to Rolling Stone. The left has become America’s biggest hate group. ]


"Journal of Whites in Higher Education"? Unthinkable. Racist. But

"Journal of Blacks in Higher Education" [1] is ok.



#KillAllWhiteMen? What about #KillAllMuslims?

The announcement that UK prosecutors have dropped the charges against a students’ union official accused of tweeting #KillAllWhiteMen has been hailed as a victory for free speech by supporters who led the protests over her arrest. Well, it’s a start. But there is little prospect of turning the tide in the free-speech wars unless and until such people also campaign against official and unofficial censorship of those with whom they disagree. And will even defend free speech for those they despise.
Yes, it is all well and good to defend Bahar Mustafa, the Goldsmiths student diversity officer arrested and charged under UK communications law. As the free-speech lobby English PEN claims, noting that the hashtag #KillAllWhiteMen ‘was clearly a joke’ rather than a real threat: ‘It was a political statement, however inadvisable it was for an elected students’ union official to post it.’
So, what about the #IStandWithBaharMustafa crowd defending freedom of expression for other objectionable jokes and political statements – such as the hashtag, which Mustafa claims she was responding to, #KillAllMuslims? Would the entire civil-liberties lobby be so outraged if some other idiot was arrested for tweeting #KillAllBlackWomen? Not quite, the record suggests


Ann Coulter: You Can’t Say “Mexican Judge”,
But You Can Sure Say “White Jury”!   

Donalt Trump is racist when he complains a hispanic activist judge who is member of an activist organization that helps illegal hispanic immigrants.
But Anti-Racists can always complain about all white juries, white judges, and white police like in Ferguson.

More at Judges and Juries



Mistakes are unforgivable if they violate the narrative

 The morning after the 2016 terrorist attack on the gay nightclub in Orlando, Jim Cavanaugh, a former official at the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and an NBC News law enforcement analyst, said that his best guess was that the shooter might have been “rooted in white hate movements,” and had picked the club “because it’s a diverse club and he hates diverse people.” 126

When the false prediction fits the anti-racist narrative, it is forgotten and forgiven.

But all fury breaks lose if a false prediction is counter the narrative:

Twenty years ago, terrorism expert Steven Emerson ruined his career by going on TV the night of the Oklahoma City bombing and saying the attack had all the earmarks of Islamic terrorism. 127 Emerson has been reviled for that statement ever since— his name cannot be mentioned without it coming up. It will be in his obituary. But today, we’re required to falsely blame Americans for every Islamic jihadist’s attack.
[Source: Coulter, Ann. In Trump We Trust: E Pluribus Awesome! (pp. 126-127). Penguin Publishing Group. Kindle Edition. Evidence in footnotes of the book]

Continues at Unequal Rights #2



Borussia Dortmund start 'no beer for racists' campaign with 1m beermats


The city of Dortmund has a large far-right scene which the club are campaigning against.
Borussia Dortmund have started a "no beer for racists" campaign, with the club's fan department supplying local pubs with a total of one million beermats to be used throughout the city of Dortmund.

Imagine instead a restaurant policy:

  • "No beer for Blacks"
  • "No beer for Muslims"
  • "No beer for undocumented aliens (Illegals)"
  • "No beer for refugees"

See also Flipping Race to show inequality




Why is the NFL Losing White Fans?


Forbes columnist Mike Ozanian, think it is because of the Black Lives Matter protest started by Colin Kaepernick. Originally, the backup mulatto quarterback of the San Francisco 49ers sat during the national anthem that precedes each game. Now Mr. Kaepernick takes a knee during the anthem, with several other players from various teams joining him. Still other players give the black-power salute. All the protesters so far have been black. Mr. Ozanian writes:




Anti-White Hate Crimes



Blackhair Magazine Accidentally Uses White Model on Latest Cover

Blackhair Magazine racist mistake

An ‘international bi-monthly magazine for the style conscious black woman’ has come under fire after mistakenly using a white model for a cover photo despite only using black or mixed race models as policy.
Successful model Emily Bador came forward to say that at on old image of her had been used by the mag, writing in a lengthy Instagram post: “I hold up my hands, I’m so so so sorry and I’m very sorry this cover was taken away from a black woman.”

She added that she believes the photo was taken when she was 15, that she never intended for it to be used in Blackhair and that she didn’t understand cultural appropriation when she took part in the shoot.


Amnesty International Attacks Democracies, Forgives Islamist Tyrannies

According to Amnesty International, the centers that host migrants arriving in Italy, known as "hotspots," are like concentration camps. This is what you learn from Amnesty International's new report, which accuses Italy of nothing less than "torturing" migrants. The report features a sequence of testimonies, never proven, that describe methods worthy of a South American military junta.
The report validates Salman Rushdie's accusation against Amnesty International: "Morally bankrupt." The Wall Street Journal added two more charges against the famous Western non-governmental organization (NGO): "Anti-American fervor and intellectual confusion".
In the new Amnesty International report, a "witness," under the name of only "Adam," speaks of "a kind of clamp with three ends" by which Italian policemen allegedly grabbed his testicles. Evidence? Medical reports attesting to this violence? The version of the Italian police? Not in the wonderful world of Amnesty International, where a Western democracy can be safely accused of "torture" with flimsy, sub-standard, unverifiable "evidence" -- the same as Amnesty's many spurious charges against Israel. The Italian police and Interior Ministry denied all the charges, calling them ridiculous.
Already in February 2016, Antonio Marchesi, president of the Italian section of Amnesty, said: "Those in Italy who have committed acts of torture can sleep soundly." A month ago, Amnesty issued a similar report on the immigration centers in Australia, another democracy denounced as a "torturer" by this now badly-degraded NGO that won the now badly-degraded Nobel Peace Prize in 1977. [...]
It seems that Amnesty International abandoned the battle of human rights in favor of a grotesque anti-Western bias. This shift is why the British weekly, The Economist, accused Amnesty International of "reserving more pages to human rights abuses in Britain and the United States than in Belarus and Saudi Arabia." This is the same muddled moral equivalence that probably led Amnesty International to use the same language for Italian "hotspots" as for the Saydnaya prison in Syria, run by the regime of Bashar al Assad. [...]
In the name of "protecting human rights," Amnesty International has even excused Islamic extremism. The secretary general of Amnesty, Claudio Cordone, said that "defensive jihad" is not "antithetical" to the struggle for human rights. He said this in response to a petition on Amnesty's relationship with CAGE (formerly CagePrisoners), the NGO founded by Islamic extremist Moazzam Begg that campaigns for the release of acclaimed jihadists. [...]
Amnesty International sponsored a rally in Brussels, where Islamist speakers celebrated the 9/11 attacks, denied the Holocaust, and demonized gays and Jews. Before that, Amnesty refused to punish an official, Kristyan Benedict, Amnesty's UK campaign manager, who tweeted: "Israeli regimes [sic] response to our Gaza report: Amnesty is 'a propaganda tool for Hamas & other terror groups' (#JSIL?)." The hashtag "#JSIL" is used on Twitter to compare Israel with the Islamic State terrorist organization by replacing "Islamic" with "Jewish" in the group's common alias, ISIL. Amnesty also sponsored a speaking tour of Bassem Tamimi, a Palestinian militant who promotes anti-Semitic conspiracy theories. [Amnesty International Attacks Democracies, Forgives Islamist Tyrannies]


Chicago Police Hesitant To Call Videotaped Torture Of White Man A Hate Crime Read more:

  Scott Greer Deputy Editor 10:32 PM 01/04/2017  41820  1450


Chicago law enforcement officials were reluctant to call the videotaped torture of a white man by black assailants a hate crime Wednesday night — even though the suspects repeatedly said “fuck white people” as they attacked their victim.
Video emerged Wednesday of an unidentified white man — bound and gagged — being beaten, cut and berated by four African-Americans. One assailant yelled “Fuck Donald Trump! Fuck white people!” as he kicked the man. Another video showed the suspects forcing the white male to drink toilet water as they laugh hysterically. (RELATED: F**k Donald Trump, F**k White People!’: 4 People In Custody After Man Kidnapped, Tortured On Facebook Live)


Blacks Torture White Man and Say “F*ck White People”, Commentary by Jared Taylor 139 Comments Is it a hate crime?


Call This Disgusting Attack Exactly What It Is: A Trump-Hating Race Crime, Daily Mail 0 Comments Piers Morgan points out the disgraceful double standards.

Piers Morgan, Daily Mail, January 5, 2017
Few things shock me, as a hard-bitten journalist.
But today, I’m in shock.
I just watched a video that didn’t just sicken me, it contaminated every pore of my soul with feelings of pure, unadulterated, raw disgust and hatred.
The short piece of film I endured depicts a gang of four black teenage thugs, two male, two female, abusing and torturing a poor terrified young white man with special needs.
The sheer scale of their depravity appears to know no bounds.
These smirking scumbags tie him up, gag him, kick him, punch him, scalp him by viciously slashing his hair with a knife, and flick burning cigarette ash on the head wounds they inflict in the process.
They laugh, they jeer, then one of them shouts: ‘F**k Donald Trump, n***a, f**k white people!’

See Flipping Race to show inequality

Another urges the victim to say, “I love black people.”
And then they force him at knifepoint to say, “F**k Donald Trump.”
This is not a quick, spontaneous assault. The victim is believed to have been held for up to 48 hours. The live Facebook stream itself goes on for more than 30 minutes.
‘Kiss the floor, b**ch!’the attackers howl. Then they shove his face into a toilet bowl.
Their goal is to utterly humiliate him, self-evidently, from their own mouths, because he’s white.
This is payback, again confirmed by their own words, for Donald Trump, a man they presume to be a racist, becoming President.
Yet police in Chicago, where the attack happened, are currently refusing to say if they are treating this as a racially or politically motivated ‘hate crime’.
‘Kids make stupid mistakes,’ said Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson. ‘Part of whether or we not we seek a hate crime (is to) determine whether or not this is sincere or stupid ranting and raving. I think part of it is just stupidity. At this point, we don’t have anything concrete to point (toward a hate crime).
Are you bloody kidding me?
First, these are absolutely not ‘kids’. They are all 18 years old.
Second, what they did wasn’t ‘just stupidity’, it was pre-meditated torture of a horrendous nature.
Third, what more did they need to do to justify this being a racially and politically motivated hate crime – tar his body with the words, ‘white boy Trump trash’?
Imagine for a moment that a young black man with special needs had been kidnapped, abused and tortured by a gang of smirking white youths?
Imagine watching a video of this black man’s horrific ordeal streamed live on Facebook?
Imagine seeing and hearing the white assailants systematically torment their black victim, physically and mentally?
Imagine watching them kicking him, punching him, scalping him and flicking burning cigarette ash on the wounds they inflicted with their vicious, sustained assault?
Imagine hearing one of them shouting ‘F**k Barack Obama! F**k black people!’ as they did so?
Then imagine the video of all this emerging and hitting TV screens and news websites across America.
All hell would rightly have broken loose.

See Flipping Race to show inequality

There would have been instant huge protests, and probably riots.
The #BlackLivesMatter group would have lit up social media demanding ‘justice’.
Black celebrities, led by the likes of Beyoncé and John Legend, would have made statements expressing their fury at the incident and their solidarity with the victim.
Police, under the huge pressure of such concerted public outrage, would have undoubtedly confirmed this as a hate crime.
Yet as I write this, I don’t see any protests, riots, social media campaigns or celebrity statements.
I don’t even see the police having the guts to call this attack what it is.
The reason is sadly all too obvious; they don’t want to inflame tensions any further in a city that has become the very epicenter of violence in modern America.
In 2016, Chicago had 762 murders and 4,331 shooting victims.
Homicides increased by 57% over 2015.
Many parts of the city have become no-go areas as gangs patrol the streets waging a relentless turf war.
Let’s not hide behind any spineless politically correct rhetoric when it comes to apportioning blame: the vast majority of those doing the shooting and being shot are young black African-American men.
I’m not being ‘racist when I say this, it’s just a simple fact.
And let’s be equally clear about what happened in Chicago on Tuesday: a bunch of racist, Trump-hating young black teenagers exacted an appalling hate crime on a defenseless young mentally disabled white man.

Nigel Farage accuses London Mayor Sadiq Khan of hypocrisy for attacking Trump's immigration ban while entertaining ELEVEN diplomats from countries that bar Israelis [dailymail]


Nigel Farage hit out at London Mayor Sadiq Khan on Twitter last night  He accused him of being a hypocrite over his stance on US immigration ban Mr Farage said Mayor invited countries that 'ban Jewish Israelis' to meeting More than 100 countries were represented at summit in London last night  [Read more: dailymail



Denying Membership based on Race

Black Caucus Chafes at Latino Who Wants to Join [Amren]
Heather Caygle, Politico, February 3, 2017
Rep. Adriano Espaillat wants to join the Congressional Black Caucus. The question for the group’s members is whether he qualifies as African-American.
So far, the answer is no.
Espaillat, who in November became the first Dominican-American elected to Congress, identifies himself as a “Latino of African descent.” The CBC has a long-standing policy of limiting its caucus to African-American members, denying membership to white lawmakers in the past who have tried to join, even if they represent majority-minority districts.




Needed In Response To The Berkeley Riot: A New “Dear Colleague” Letter, A Federal Civil Rights Investigation–And Some Arrests

Had this been white students blocking any minority student, or Jewish students blocking Muslim students, not only would have the UCB administrators acted swiftly to expel the students, local prosecutors and Federal prosecutors would have quickly arrested those students and prosecuted them.
That did not happen to the Asian students and their criminal acts violating the civil rights of white students.  The OCR, in addition to the Civil Rights Division (CRD) of the Justice Department are soon to be under new management.  So the Trump Administration has considerable power to subdue the criminal regime in charge at UCB, led by Chancellor Nicholas Dirks, who denounced Milo before his appearance and appears to have ordered the UCB Police Department and the Berkeley Police Department to back off suppressing the riot and violence that led to the cancellation of Milo’s speech.
Both the City of Berkeley and the UCB Police Department, as well as the City itself and UCB are vulnerable to a civil rights investigation for violating Milo’s rights as well as those of the other victims of the violence, who were uniformly white.  Failure to take action by police officers and State and local governments is prohibited by Title 18 United States Code Section 242, Violation Of Rights Under Color Of Authority.
Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
UCB and other campuses of the University of California (UC) system are engaged in systematic violation of rights of white and Jewish students and the Trump Administration has the power to make the State of California and the UC system pay dearly.
And the UC system is particularly vulnerable given its ongoing flagrant criminal activity harboring thousands of illegal aliens in violation of Title 8 United States Code, Section 1324, Harboring Certain Aliens. A one-two set of punches from the Trump Administration could send the UC system reeling, and many UC employees to prison.





Swiss Medical Staff Learns Self-Defense Because Islam Diversity


80% of attacks on hospital staff does NOT lead to criminal complaints. Imagine how few attacks lead to convictions and thus enter crime statistics!

NARRATIVE TEXT: In training courses, doctors and nurses now learn techniques of self defense. But aggressive patients will also have to fear the legal consequences: Every fifth attack in the Insel A&E leads to a criminal complaint.

Unequal Rights:
Chinese into Tibet: criminal genocide.
Africans into Europe: Good Diversity

  1. Bringing ethnic Chinese into Tibet: Called Genocide by United Nations and the German Parliament
  2. Bringing Iraquis into Kuwait: a cause for war
  3. Bringing Africa into Europe: whoever opposes that is a Racist, Nazi, ....

See also Chinese to Tibet




Violent Antifa coddled, right self defense mercilessly prosecuted

Unequal rights, left privilege: violent antifa enjoys impunity with left privilege. Right wing self defense is mercilessly repressed.

See Black/Left Privilege

Unequal treatment, unequal rights


Police have also charged Proud Boys for defending themselves from antifa attacks, most notably in New York City last month. Right-leaning protesters from the “Him Too” rally in Portland seemed to know this; they urged followers not to fight back against antifa, even as they were spat on.  If a Proud Boy spat on a leftist or punched a leftist who spat on him, he would surely be charged with assault. The NLG would almost certainly not defend him
Leftist radicals enjoy financial, legal, and (most importantly) mainstream media support, but anyone who fights back is condemned by the very conservative movement he is trying to defend. Last month National Review editor Rich Lowry cheered the persecution of the Proud Boys and denounced the “poisonous allure of right-wing violence.”
Thus far, despite the massive rise in antifa violence since President Trump’s inauguration, there have been few legal penalties for the masked radicals. The majority of protesters arrested for rioting and other crimes during President Trump’s inauguration were let off without penalty. Former college professor Eric Clanton, who was caught on video splitting someone’s head open with a bike lock in an unprovoked attack, was let off with probation.
Even in non-political cases, antifa are treated leniently. Portland antifa leader Micah Rhodes pled guilty to sexual crimes involving an underage teen boy, but an Oregon judge ignored state sentencing requirements and gave him probation. These cases are in sharp contrast to the persecution of groups such as RAM and the Proud Boys, and the draconian penalties sought against Unite The Right protesters in Charlottesville caught in a melee that independent investigators concluded could have been prevented by state and local authorities.
President Donald Trump may mock antifa for supposedly having tiny muscles and living in basements, but they seem to have more power than he does. The Justice Department is ignoring their crimes while arresting and persecuting their enemies. If President Trump is serious about curbing antifa crimes, he should order acting Attorney General Matt Whitaker to take action. Until he does, dissidents would be wise to ignore President Trump’s boasting. He is not dispensing equal justice.
One might imagine that President Trump is trying to flush out his antifa opponents so his Justice Department could arrest them. Of course, that’s not what’s happening. It’s just another manifestation of the tragedy of the Trump Administration; this president never really took control of his own government. Either he knows and doesn’t care what the FBI is doing or he doesn’t even know. [Source: Violent Antifa coddled, right self defense mercilessly prosecuted]



Was “unsere” Multikulti-Politiker den Europäern mit dem aufgezwungenen Zwangs-Multikulti antun, die langfristige Auslöschung der deutschen (französischen, italienischen…) ethnisch-kulturellen Identität als jahrtausend alte Völker, verurteilen sie im Fall Tibet. Siehe Bundestags-Entschließung 13/4445 vom 23.4.1996 Darin verurteilte die Bundesrepublik die chinesische Zuwanderungs-Politik in Tibet, weil dadurch die tibetische Identität „zerstört“ wird:
[…] Im Hinblick darauf, dass die Tibeter sich in der gesamten Geschichte eine eigene ethnische, kulturelle und religiöse Identität bewahrt haben, verurteilt der Bundestag die Politik der chinesischen Behörden, die im Ergebnis in bezug auf Tibet zur Zerstörung der Identität der Tibeter führt, insbesondere mit Ansiedlung und Zuwanderung von Chinesen in großer Zahl, Zwangsabtreibungen, politischer, religiöser und kultureller Verfolgung und Unterstellung des Landes unter eine chinesisch kontrollierte Administration.

fordert die Bundesregierung auf, sich verstärkt dafür einzusetzen, daß … die chinesische Regierung jede Politik einstellt, welche die Zerstörung der tibetischen Kultur zur Folge haben kann, wie z. B. die planmäßige Ansiedlung von Chinesen in großer Zahl, um die tibetische Bevölkerung zurückzudrängen, und die Verfolgung der Vertreter der tibetischen Kultur…
Für die UNO ist der Versuch, ein Volk mittels Massenzuwanderung an den Rand zu drängen, sogar ein Kriegsgrund. Siehe die UNO-Resolution 677 aus dem Jahre 1990 bezüglich des Einmarsches des Iraks nach Kuwait. Deutschland hat diesem Kriegsgrund (der Resolution) zugestimmt:
Der Sicherheitsrat verurteilt den Versuch des Irak, die demographische Zusammensetzung der Bevölkerung von Kuwait zu verändern und die amtlichen Dokumente über die Bevölkerungs-Zusammensetzung der legitimen kuwaiter Regierung zu vernichten.
Es kann nicht sein, dass die Europäer aufgrund einer völlig verantwortungslosen und selbstverschuldeten Bevölkerungsexplosion der dritten Welt in ihren eigenen Ländern zu ethnischen Minderheiten, und somit über kurz oder lang vollkommen als Völker ausgelöscht werden.  [Source pi-news]

fordert die AfD auf, [...]
  • die deutsche Regierung jede Politik einstellt, welche die Zerstörung der deutschen Kultur zur Folge haben kann, wie z. B. die planmäßige Ansiedlung von Muslimen, Arabern, Afrikanern in großer Zahl, um die deutsche Bevölkerung zurückzudrängen, und die Verfolgung der Vertreter der deutschen Kultur, [...]
  • die wirtschaftlichen, sozialen, rechtlichen und politischen Benachteiligungen der deutschen Bevölkerung aufgehoben werden,


Schockiert? Rassistische Islamophobe Nazis?

Wir haben nur die Ethnien ausgewechselt um zu zeigen wie ungerecht diese Welt ist.


Shocked? Racist islamophobi Nazis?

We just praciced Flipping Ethnicity to show inequality


fordert die Bundesregierung auf, [...]
  • - die chinesische Regierung jede Politik einstellt, welche die Zerstörung der tibetischen Kultur zur Folge haben kann, wie z. B. die planmäßige Ansiedlung von Chinesen in großer Zahl, um die tibetische Bevölkerung zurückzudrängen, und die Verfolgung der Vertreter der tibetischen Kultur,  [...]
  • die wirtschaftlichen, sozialen, rechtlichen und politischen Benachteiligungen der tibetischen Bevölkerung aufgehoben werden,  [Quelle Bundestags-Entschließung 13/4445 vom 23.4.1996]


NOTE: it is a petition, it does not seem that the petition was approved


Deutscher Bundestag: Drucksache 13/4445 vom 23.04.1996




Bei der Tibet-Entschließung des Deutschen Bundestages am 20. Juni 1996 haben sowohl der Bundesminister des Auswärtigen, Klaus Kinkel, als auch die Sprecher der verschiedenen Parteien klargestellt, dass sie ungeachtet ihrer Kritik an der Lage der Menschenrechte in Tibet davon ausgehen, dass Tibet ein Teil des chinesischen Staatsverbandes ist. Die Entschließung unterstützt die Ausgestaltung einer Autonomie, die die Erhaltung der kulturellen und religiösen Identität des tibetischen Volkes sicherstellt.36 [source]

Ja, es ist Völkermord…


Sind die Deutschen die Tibeter Europas?


Continues at Unequal Rights #2


Site Map


4Racism.org Logo