Racism Saves Lives • #RacismIsLove #4Racism Racism is Love #RacismIsLove #4Racism
 • Anti-Racism is Anti-Science

#TheTruthIsRacist • #BlackLivesMatter2RacistsDisclaimer • 4Racism.org

4Racism.org is under construction and very incomplete

Could It Be Time To Deny Black Women the Vote?

Some of the biggest blows to the conservative cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of Non-Whites and women. If only white men were allowed to vote, Obama would have never been president, world government debts would be minute because leftist welfare spending parties would never have won elections.  …

STOP. Calm Down.

 We could never dare to claim

Could It Be Time To Deny Black Women The Vote?

The true, and socially acceptable title is

Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise?

We are just Flipping Race to show inequality.  One may discriminate against all white men, but not against any non-white "minority". 

Demanding "Could It Be Time To Deny Black Women The Vote?  would be a world wide scandal!! Demanding the opposite, to disenfranchise white men did not cause any waves.  Whites don't have the same rights as "minorities". Nor does the male minority have the same rights as the female majority.

/End Race Flipping. Follows true article


Could It Be Time To Deny White Men The Franchise? [Amren]

Shelley Garland, Huffington Post, April 13, 2017
Some of the biggest blows to the progressive cause in the past year have often been due to the votes of white men. If white men were not allowed to vote, it is unlikely that the United Kingdom would be leaving the European Union, it is unlikely that Donald Trump would now be the President of the United States, and it is unlikely that the Democratic Alliance would now be governing four of South Africa’s biggest cities.

No, this is not April's fools day. Rather a serious suggestion.

  1. It is a big mistake to allow the social justice warriors take the high ground and call their destructive policies and social Engineering "a progressive cause".
  2. The Left-Racists think that their noble goal of  Universalism or Egalitarianism justifies all non-democratic repressive means. Anti-Racists are guilty of Racism, all racist sins. The "progressive" Left MUST gain power by all means, albeit illegal and anti-democratic.
If white men no longer had the vote, the progressive cause would be strengthened.

If Black men and women no longer had the vote, the conservative cause would be strengthened

Flipping Race to show inequality. See what can be said and what can never be said.

Anti-Racist means Anti-White

Anti-white racism

It would not be necessary to deny white men indefinitely – the denial of the vote to white men for 20 years (just less than a generation) would go some way to seeing a decline in the influence of reactionary and neo-liberal ideology in the world.

That is nice. After a birth jihad and lots of immigration, whites will be out-numbered, out-voted and can vote again.

 The influence of reckless white males were one of the primary reasons that led to the Great Recession which began in 2008.

And affirmative action, giving Blacks privileged access to loans, caused the Subprime crisis.

The Left forgets that white men created all technology, science, medicine, cars, iPhones, created economic systems, created democracy  and legal systems.

Whites fought to liberate slaves world wide against the resistance of Africans and Arabs. I agree that whites created unnecessary crises in the systems they themselves created.

And note, all non-whites desire to live in countries created and governed by whites.

White countries for everyone? - White GeNOcide Project: White people invented almost everything we have today, Asians are the second ... with its superior technology and way of life be seen as the whites themselves ...

This would also strike a blow against toxic white masculinity, one that is long needed.

No one would dare to suggest a blow against toxic black masculinity and high crime rates of Blacks. You know, Crime statistics are racist


At the same time, a denial of the franchise to white men, could see a redistribution of global assets to their rightful owners.

Whites created all the technology, without white technology crude oil would be as worthless as it was 500 years ago.  Also, note that according to PC, whites are not even the rightful owners of Europe or North America!

After all, white men have used the imposition of Western legal systems around the world to reinforce modern capitalism.

Communism, African tribal legal system, Sharia law, which one would you prefer? Non-capitalist, non-western system works anywhere (except, maybe East Asian high IQ countries like China?)

A period of twenty years without white men in the world’s parliaments and voting booths will allow legislation to be passed which could see the world’s wealth far more equitably shared.

Like in the Sowjet Union? Communist China? Cuba? Venezuela? South Africa?

The violence of white male wealth and income inequality will be a thing of the past.

Maybe income inequality is due to different capacity of people to produce income. The mere thought of this is taboo, according to the  Equality dogma: all races are equal. In spite of irrefutable scientific proof for Race differences in IQ

This redistribution of the world’s wealth is long overdue. {snip}

Of course, one needs to produce the wealth first, and seemingly only high IQ countries produce wealth.

Over the past 500 years colonialism, slavery, and various aggressive wars and genocides, have been due to the actions of white men.

Some research easily unearths 1000 years of aggressive wars and slavery perpetrated by Muslims, genocides in Ruanda,  genocide by Turkey, Mass killings by communist Lenin, Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot.   


 Redistributing some of their assets will go some way to paying the historical debt that they owe society.

Or it could lead to collapse, if the assets are not maintained nor produced any more. Zimbabwe, South Africa, Haiti, etc. come to mind.


It is no surprise that liberalism – and its ideological offshoots of conservatism and libertarianism – are the most popular ideologies among white males. These ideologies with their focus on individuals and individual responsibility, rather than group affiliation, allow white men to ignore the debt that they owe society, and from acknowledging that most of their assets, wealth, and privilege are the result of theft and violence.

Leftist ideology.

Some may argue that this is unfair. Let’s be clear, it may be unfair, but a moratorium on the franchise for white males for a period of between 20 and 30 years is a small price to pay for the pain inflicted by white males on others, particularly those with black, female-identifying bodies. {snip}

Original Article